I am interested in the debt cancellation program and wanted to make sure that it was available and if the program still has 100 percent success rate?

ANSWER:

Yes, the 100% success rate still remains. It is important to understand how this claim is justified.

ANSWER: Yes. The student loans were created just as fraudulently as the credit card debts. The system has been working with federally insured student loans because they were created under the same false, phony, money-out-of-thin-air process.

The DCS document content is undefeated and undefeatable.

ANSWER:

Because the money lenders were not the sources of those goods and services. The merchants who provided the goods and services were paid, but the money lenders produced nothing. Furthermore, the money lenders never loaned anything. No money ever came out of their accounts to issue your lines of credit.

They pretended to make loans when actually nothing was ever loaned.
That is called fraud.

We are simply confronting them with the truth and they cannot deny it. We strongly recommend that everyone read the book “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin. It is available at Amazon.com. That book reveals the fascinating story of the creation of the Federal Reserve banking system, and what the banks of today are “loaning” has never been true money, but rather just fictions created out of thin air, in a sophisticated strategy for the bankers to take over and enslave the world.

ANSWER:

It doesn’t work to cancel debts that are legitimately owed, such as money your friend or father loaned you, or say a department store credit card where you received merchandise from that store AND the store did not sell the paper to another loan servicing company. If the department store kept the loan paper in-house, then that is a legitimate debt. The invalid debts, which this set successfully cancels, are the money-out-of-thin-air debts under the Federal Reserve system such as Visa, MasterCard, Discover, and other institutional credit issues.

It is an unsecured loan, however the lender matches borrowers with investors rather than directly loaning out the money from themselves.

ANSWER:

If the “investors” you speak of---and the term would be more accurately stated as “lenders”---are individuals, then the money they are lending is coming out of their accounts, and reducing their accounts by the amount loaned. Those are real and legitimate loans that should ethically and legally be repaid. The loans that can be cancelled are really magic tricks. They are the vast majority of instances where Visa, MasterCards, and other unsecured lines of credit received money that the financial institutions created under the Federal Reserve System and never had any deduction out of their accounts.

Rather, they simply did a computer entry, where they created it out of thin air. This is called the Mandrake Mechanism. They have nothing at risk. The fact that they pretend otherwise is fraud.

Thus the reason we have a 100% success rate in cancelling those debts is that we challenge them to prove that they really loaned something, that money really came out of their accounts and that they had something at risk. They can’t do it. The type of loans being talking about here would be legitimately repayable, UNLESS they were made by banks or financial institutions under the Fed system using the Mandrake Mechanism.

Related Question:
What happens if for some reason one does get a judgment against them; is there help for them then?

ANSWER TO BOTH QUESTIONS:

Yes. Previously we used to say that this is an administrative process only and that we don’t assist with litigation, because it was so rarely ever needed, and we are not lawyers. However, we now have an exceptionally powerful and successful legal team to assist with such matters and we have only wins and victories with no failures or losses. There are nominal additional fees for litigation, depending upon how simple the matter is, but suffice it to say, we do make available to you formidable additional resources as backup support for anyone who gets sued or for whom may want to commence a lawsuit as plaintiff.

ANSWER:

Good question. No. After the debt has been cancelled, the credit card institution will close out that account. So no, that card will not be useful anymore. As a matter of fact, that institution would probably not want you again as a customer. After all, they’re making a pretty lucrative racket by pretending to loan money when nothing---not a penny---EVER came out of their accounts to ANY credit card customer! So when they realize you’re not going to play that game anymore, you’re no longer a viable source of free money for them. They can’t prove that they didn’t commit fraud, and so that is why they will let the debt go away when you challenge them head on. But on the other hand, they’re going to keep their free gravy train going as long as possible. Customers who wise up to it are no longer welcome.

Further, in good conscience, it would not be ethical for the customer to deliberately create credit card debts and then cancel them, knowing in advance that it is a fraud.

The action outlined by the DCS system allows you to act in good faith, showing that you have learned about the fraud only AFTER having already unwittingly allowed the so-called “debt” to exist for some time and after having mistakenly honored it by making payments to it.

Some customers have received responses to the DCS letters with statements like the following: “When your account was opened with us and you used the credit card, you made a promise to pay for all goods and services provided through the related credit card transactions, as well as any associated fees. You renewed that promise each time you used your credit card.”

ANSWER:

These customers have felt hurt, guilty, and accused by such statements, and have wondered how to respond. The key principle in law to be aware of in this context is this:

“Fraud vitiates the most solemn Contracts, documents and even judgments.”
—[U.S. vs. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, at pg. 65].

Other customers have received letters with statements like: “Please be advised that under Section 226.13 of the Truth in Lending Act, you must notify us in writing within 60 days after we sent you the first statement regarding any suspected error or requests for additional information regarding specific transactions made on your account. As long as the detailed transaction information is provided to you on your statement, we do not need to provide you with copies of your receipts during that billing cycle.”

ANSWER:

This does not address the foundation, which is that no loan ever existed. All the Truth in Lending Act citation is referring to, is if there are errors in the charges. If there are erroneous charges on the account, then one is required to notify them within 60 days. That has nothing to do with the fact that no loan ever existed in the first place, and the fact that they are in default on proving otherwise. And the DCS documents do not request “receipts.” The above effort on the pretender lenders’ part to try to distract you into thinking you did something wrong, is just a deceptive sleight of hand---anything to get your attention off the central issue, that they never loaned anything. That’s why in an instance like this, your job is simple: just “rinse and repeat.”

Remember, it is the CONSTANT REPETITION of our central allegations that eventually makes them give up and go away.

Stay firm and focused like a laser beam on following the DCS instructions. No one who has ever done so has lost.

Those who understand American sovereign status, HJR-192 of June 5, 1933, the Uniform Commercial Code, and commercial remedies such as our rights as creditors to create money in accordance with the UCC, know that debts can be set off or discharged by the issuance of proper credit instruments. Why then do you speak of creating money out of thin air, as if it is some kind of wrong or illegal or unethical act?

ANSWER:

There would be nothing unethical about creating money out of thin air… IF it were to be offered equally across the board to everyone, openly with full disclosure, with equal opportunity, and with publicly sanctioned assistance in implementing it to all people without discrimination.

What is unethical is to do it like a magic trick, hidden behind the scenes, keep it a secret from everyone, pretend that the loans came out of their supposedly already existing, genuine, and limited funds, and that they would therefore be financially harmed if you don’t pay it back.

That is harmful dishonesty, plain and simple. It is deliberate and unjust enrichment designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many. Read books like “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Ed Griffin, or “Secrets of the Federal Reserve” by Eustace Mullin linked above. They explain in crystal clear, irrefutable terms exactly how the “Mandrake Mechanism” works; how they create money out of thin air and pretend that it is real.

Further, most people don’t realize that in all 50 states, it is illegal to loan credit.

It is legal to loan money, but not credit. And yet that is exactly what the pretender lenders have been doing. Thus the commercial remedies rightfully provided to us under the UCC have not worked for most people, even when presented properly, for the simple reason that the egomaniacal controllers have monopolized the benefits of the system for the insiders, at the exclusion and the expense of everyone else. It is for that reason that our credit card debt cancellation system challenges the fraud, rather than attempting to discharge the debt. And it is for that reason that this approach has been undefeated.

In other words: Once I complete your paperwork, how long does it take for the debt to be completely eliminated? ANSWER: You can get started immediately upon receiving the documents from the website. Most people only need 20 or 30 minutes to create the customized versions of the documents for each debt that is to be cancelled. After sending them registered mail return receipt requested, within a few weeks a rebuttal will come from the pretender lender or their collection agent. The rebuttal will show that YOU HAVE WON! How? Because it will FAIL COMPLETELY to even address any of the points in your dispute letter, much less answer them or prove that the debt is valid by fulfilling your demands for compliance with the law. Their letter will beat around the bush, claim this and that, but will strategically avoid answering the allegations made in your dispute letter. They are now caught, and they cannot escape. But, they hope that you will be intimidated and will submit or comply silently without protest, or will get distracted and get off point. So, you very calmly just print out, sign, and send registered mail (return receipt requested) the very same letter, as you will see in the instructions. Just follow the simple instructions that come with the program. Very simple. Like washing your hair, “rinse and repeat.” A few weeks later, they will probably send another silly rebuttal. Once again it will completely fail to even address any of the points. So, repeat the same process. Send the letter again, according to the instructions. Very simple, very easy, and it doesn’t take much time to do. This process may go on for a few months, therefore, we are more than willing to help make sure all letters are sent out in a timely matter. Gradually you will hear from them less and less. Most customers stop hearing from the pretender lender and their agents within 3 to 6 months. It is when you have not heard from them for a while, that you know they have given up. They know they are beaten, but they will never admit it in writing, but the lenders themselves won’t admit to it in writing that they were wrong, because then they would be liable for billions, even trillions of dollars worth of fraudulent debts to hundreds of millions of people over decades. It’s a big thing. So, they would much rather just let you go, quietly.

ANSWER: As discussed above, why would you continue to use credit, once you know that it is a fraud? Most of the people who have gone down this path of cancelling their debts have learned to live without credit, and use debit cards instead. However, the good news is, in actuality users of this system usually do NOT have any blemish on their credit rating. This is for the simple reason that we’ve been having them send a copy of the letters to the heads of the credit reporting agencies. In other words, whatever you are sending to the pretender lenders, you are also sending copies to the three main credit reporting agencies. That shows them that you are not in default, but instead, the debt is in dispute. As long as it is in dispute, it cannot be considered to be in default. So blemishes on credit ratings are much more rare now and even when they occur, they are erroneous and can be corrected.

ANSWER: It sounds like you are referring to procedures like those provided by Divine Province or Gold Shield Alliance / Freedom Club. They have the right approach and we applaud them for their efforts to make the cabal do the right thing. The problem is, as you know, that their success rate is very low. Most of the time, the cabal has just not been allowing those procedures to work. Yes, you could engage the DCS process simultaneously and it would create a win-win-win situation for you. On the one hand, in practically all of the many hundreds of previous cases, it has resulted in the pretender lender ceasing their collection efforts. They go away and the card holder no longer is harassed or bothered by the phony bogus debt collection attempts. However, in that situation, it would also box the pretender lender into a corner. They have the choice of either honoring the process of creation of funds under public policy to liquidate the debt as you are trying to enforce via the World Court; OR, they face being confronted with the alternative, which is being caught in their fraud, which DCS does. So DCS would both add to your enforcement, as well as liberate you from their collection attempts.

ANSWER: Most likely YES, potentially. Because all countries in the world operate under the same general monetary system as the US, more or less. The problem is, the legal citations in the DCS have never been adapted for other countries. The DCS cites laws such as “USC § 1692 et seq”, and people in other countries would have to have a lawyer or paralegal find the equivalent for their nation and replace it in the DCS documents. “USC” is the United States Code, and that only applies in the US. That’s why the introduction states at the top: “Mainly for card holders in the USA.” However, this system SHOULD work for people in other countries 100% successfully, just as it does in the US, if one replaces the US laws in the set with the laws from that country. Do you have a lawyer or paralegal who can do that? So to clarify, it’s not the citizenship of the card holder that matters. What matters is from what country the card itself was issued. For example, if someone is Canadian but has a Visa from a U.S. bank, then that qualifies. The cardholder agreement must be under the U.S. jurisdiction, thus meaning the card has to have been issued in the U.S. for the DCS system to apply as is, without legal modification. Also, another method that can possibly work for non-US citizens and residents, is if the card holder in the foreign country can transfer the card balance to a US card. For example, if someone from Australia has $7000 AUD in Visa or MasterCard debt on an Australian card, and if that same person were to acquire an American Visa or MasterCard from a US bank, that person could ask the US institution if it would transfer the $7000 AUD balance from the Australian card to the US card. Most institutions are more than happy to do so, because it gives them more business, and therefore more revenues. To them, it really doesn’t much matter what country the debt comes from. Then once the debt is on the US card, it can be cancelled using the DCS program.

ANSWER: Yes. It will cost extra, a few hundred dollars, because you will have to sue them under the direct one-on- one guidance of one of our lawyers. The DCS by itself is just a letter writing campaign. That is sufficient to get prejudgment debts cancelled, but it is not sufficient to reverse a judgment. To reverse a judgment, you will have to sue them. Furthermore, most bar-licensed attorneys are wimps when it comes to going against the banks. They’re afraid of losing their licenses. They’re mostly ignorant about the secrets of money and the Federal Reserve. So it would be hard for you to find an attorney to represent you, who would understand the content of the DCS system and make it the centerpiece of the lawsuit. If you are prepared to go Pro Se (representing yourself), or In Propria Persona (as yourself), and feel that you have the determination and the courage, then you could purchase the DCS system, and we will introduce you to one of our non-bar lawyers. He will provide personal consultation to you and will create the documents for you to file into the court case. You would follow the specific steps that the lawyer provides, and you would make the arguments in the customized documents he gives you the centerpiece of your lawsuit. The allegations in the DCS are undefeated and undefeatable by the pretender lender institutions. Our lawyers have a 100% undefeated success rate in winning all of these cases, where the client fully cooperated and did not give up. He will show you how to absolutely force your opponents to answer what is in the DCS documents. Otherwise they will weasel out of it and avoid having to answer, claiming they’re not required to answer. You have to force them to answer to the truth. Our lawyer would provide the documents to file and the words to say and what words NOT to say, to guide you to this victory.

ANSWER: Not really. Even if they give a deadline, you’re not legally bound by it, because remember, their fraud made the signed agreement null and void. But just for maintaining the effectiveness of the campaign, it makes sense to respond within a reasonable time, like a week or two. In my own case, I usually responded within 2 or 3 days. In controversies like this, the one who is on the offensive usually has the advantage, so it is good to hit right back quickly, to give them the strong impression that you are absolutely on top of them and you are neither wavering, unsure, wishy-washy, or lenient towards them. If you take too long, they might get the impression that you’re weak or apathetic, and you might be easier to push over. Your strategy is simple. One to one basis, and for each thing they send you, you send one response right away. The response will always be the first dispute letter and affidavit until and unless they get more belligerent and threatening, then use the second letter. That’s it. It’s as simple as that. If they don’t respond point-for-point to the dispute letter and satisfy what the letter demands, and if they fade away from contacting you, then you have no need to pursue them any further.

ANSWER: There is no change to make. The first sentence is “Thank you for the statement of [date], that your institution recently sent me, expecting payment for an alleged debt.” That remains true whether you are current on your payments or not. In any case, do NOT include a payment with it, because that would contradict the point of the dispute letter and remove the credibility of your challenge.

ANSWER: There is no limit. In fact, it wouldn’t make sense to cancel just a portion of a debt. It’s all or nothing. It doesn’t matter how large the debt is. Fraud is fraud

ANSWER: The concept of debt consolidation is contradictory to the debt CANCELLATION that DCS offers, because it assumes that the debt is valid, and therefore merely negotiates how to pay it. Therefore, if you wish to switch from consolidation/negotiation to complete cancellation and elimination, you will have to completely cancel all involvement with the consolidation company. It is probably best not to even mention to them the existence of DCS or its cancellation product, because the people who do consolidation make their living and their livelihood from the philosophy that the debt is valid. That is the foundation assumption on which their whole industry is based. It is an assumption which the DCS disproves, which could be frightening to the consolidation people. When they are frightened, they will react with any kind of frivolous arguments to try to refute what DCS is doing and discourage you from doing it. In other words, like any animal, they will defend their territory. It is sad. DCS rises to an entirely higher level of truth and success. It is immediately more freeing because it eliminates 100% of the debt; AND quicker, AND easier, AND more successful---100% successful! PLUS it is usually much less expensive than consolidation. That said, if you wish to switch, you would have to simply abandon, cancel, and withdraw from the entire consolidation relationship. Give them any reason you feel is truthful but not too revealing; Just something vague such as “I’ve found another approach I prefer to pursue. Thank you very much.” Then come back to our website and enroll